Group Business Review

OPERATIONS

Bodycote provides thermal processing and testing services to manufacturers in virtually every sector of the world economy. From over 300 locations in 35 countries, more than 11,000 employees provide high quality services to over 60,000 customers. The Thermal Processing Strategic Business Unit (SBU) delivered 73% of Group sales compared to 74% in 2006 and saw its sales increase by 12.4%. This SBU is organised into two divisions: Heat Treatment and Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP). The expansion of this SBU into emerging markets continued through both acquisitions and greenfield start-ups. In line with our strategy to grow rapidly the Testing SBU, sales increased by 21.1% and this SBU now makes up 27% of Group sales compared to 26% in 2006. The Testing SBU is organised into two divisions: Materials Testing, Engineering & Technology and Measurement Technology (MEM) and Health Sciences & Environmental (HSE).

COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT

In the western hemisphere we are the clear leader in thermal processing and have a unique multi-disciplinary presence in the testing market. In both thermal processing and testing, Bodycote mainly competes with local, privately owned companies and manufacturers’ captive facilities. Both supply and demand are very fragmented with hundreds of providers servicing thousands of customers. We have developed a sustainable advantage over local entrepreneurs through the superior quality of our systems, our extensive knowledge base, our breadth of technology, our flexible capacity and our broad range of services. Our proven track record of supplying thermal processing and testing services to many of the world’s most respected manufacturers is a testament to our success in outsourcing and subcontracting for manufacturers who need to reduce costs, whilst at the same time being confident that their critical components are processed to specification. Our HIP business operates in a much smaller market. We have more than 60% of the total capacity in the western hemisphere and few manufacturers invest in this technology because of the high capital cost which represents a significant barrier to entry. Competitors we have vary from smaller private companies to a small number of large corporations.

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

As a service provider to virtually all market sectors and as a business operating in many countries, we are subject to a multitude of quality, safety, environmental and regulatory requirements. We continuously monitor changes in laws, regulations and standards by adopting systems and policies to retain best-in-class compliance. Although this effort is costly in the short term, being a good corporate citizen clearly differentiates us in the market place. Customers have confidence in our quality and the sustainability of our services.

MACRO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Generally, the countries in which we operate continue to experience positive manufacturing economic conditions with inflation largely under control, although there is some uncertainty about the near term outlook especially with regard to the USA. Energy prices have remained near record highs during 2007 with different countries experiencing varying levels of movement in unit costs, but, overall, we have marginally reduced energy costs as a percentage of sales. Materials such as nickel, chrome and molybdenum, used in the baskets and fixtures in our thermal processing plants, have significantly increased in price, but we have successfully managed these costs. As a service provider we are ultimately subject to the cyclicality of our customers’ requirements. Aerospace, power generation and oil & gas demand continues to be robust. The only significant sector that we serve which has exhibited softness is automotive in North America. However, we continue to offset this softer demand by winning new business in our traditional territories, principally through outsourcing and by expanding into new geographies. In total, automotive sales increased by £14.7m (10.6% growth) in the year.

LONG TERM STRATEGY AND BUSINESS OBJECTIVES

After a thorough review in early 2005, we have articulated a strategy which incorporates four key initiatives, each aimed at enhancing shareholder value and accelerating growth:

  • expand the Group into developing manufacturing geographies;
  • increase Testing to about half of Group’s sales;
  • develop our high added value technologies; and
  • intensify outsourcing initiatives.

We measure our performance against the delivery of this strategy using the financial and non-financial indicators (shown in the table Key Performance Indicators below).

Key performance indicators

  2007   2006   5 year target
           
Financial          
Return on capital employed1 11.3%   10.8%   Mid teens %
Return on sales2 14.3%   14.3%   High teens %
Organic sales growth3 8.8%   5.5%   Mid to high single digit %
People costs as a percentage of sales4          
Thermal Processing 39.5%   40.7%   40%
Testing 53.3%   51.8%   50%
Capital expenditure/depreciation ratio5 1.3x   1.2x   0.8 – 1.3x
           
Non financial          
Capacity utilisation (Heat Treatment only)6 74%   72%   >80%
Capacity utilisation HIP6 71%   72%   >80%
ISO 14001/17025 compliant facilities7 233   184   All facilities
Accident frequency8 1.6   2.2   Zero
           

Definitions

1 Headline operating profit as a percentage of average capital employed. Capital employed includes tangible and intangible assets including all previously amortised/impaired goodwill and all non-interest bearing assets and liabilities.
2 Headline operating profit as a percentage of revenue from continuing operations.
3 Year on year increase in revenue at constant currency from continuing operations excluding revenue from acquisitions made within the prior twelve months.
4 The salary and benefit costs of all employees as a percentage of revenue from continuing operations.
5 Net capital expenditure divided by depreciation.
6 Actual revenues expressed as a percentage of theoretical maximum revenue assuming that heat treatment facilities operate 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.
7 The number of facilities holding registrations for ISO 14001 or ISO 17025.
8 Accident frequency - the number of accidents x 200,000 (approximating 100 man years), divided by the total hours worked.

Our most important indicator is the return on capital employed (ROCE) and further progress has been made in 2007 towards our 5 year target.

Overall return on sales was unchanged, with both Heat Treatment (+1%) and HIP (+3%) increasing while, as anticipated, greenfield investments, mix changes, additional infrastructure costs and difficult trading conditions in our Food and Environmental Testing businesses have resulted in a reduction of margins in the Testing SBU (-3%). Group organic sales growth (9%) was again within our target range.

People costs are the Group’s largest expense. Thermal Processing saw a reduction in these costs to 39.5% of sales thus achieving our target of 40%. People costs in Testing however, increased slightly due to the impact of added resources needed to support our acquisition programme.

Capital expenditure was within our target range and was above the level of depreciation, reflecting the Group’s establishment of new facilities in emerging markets and also the support of new outsourcing contracts. Additional capital expenditure also reinforces our commitment to additional HIP capacity with the aim of supporting growing demand in aerospace, power generation and oil & gas. We expect to benefit from these investments beginning in 2008 but particularly in 2009 and 2010.

Capacity utilisation is the key factor in improving profitability in Thermal Processing. In 2007 we saw further progress towards our goal of >80% with current utilisation in Heat Treatment at 74% (2006: 72%). HIP utilisation has temporarily decreased following the installation of a new large unit at our Washington facility to 71% (2006: 75%).

We have largely achieved our target of having all the Group’s facilities meet the environmental standard ISO 14001 or the laboratory management standard ISO 17025. Significant improvements in our work related accident rates have been achieved over the past four years by a combination of training, systems and cultural change. We remain committed to achieving the highest standards of safety for our people and having zero accidents remains our goal.

During the year, twelve businesses were acquired for net consideration of £32.7m. Ten of these acquisitions were thermal processing businesses, with the remainder being within the Testing SBU.

FINANCIAL RESULTS FOR 2007

Financial results for 2007

  Revenue1   Headline
operating profit
  Margin
           
  2007   2006   2007   2006   2007   2006
  £m   £m   £m   £m   %   %
                       
Heat Treatment 421.7   375.0   61.6   50.3   14.6   13.4
HIP 43.5   38.9   15.4   12.8   35.4   32.9
Thermal Processing 465.2   413.9   77.0   63.1   16.6   15.2
Testing 175.3   144.7   21.0   21.3   12.0   14.7
Head office costs     (6.7)   (4.7)    
Group Total 640.5   558.6   91.3   79.7   14.3   14.3
                       

Notes

1Revenue from continuing operations after deducting intersegment sales.

                       

Headline operating profit is defined as follows:

    2007   2006
    £m   £m
         
Headline operating profit   91.3   79.7
Share of associates’ interest and tax     (0.6)
Amortisation/impairment of acquired intangible fixed assets   (1.9)   (1.0)
Impairment of goodwill   (7.2)   (6.0)
Impairment of investment in associate     (8.3)
Change to pension scheme rules   4.1  
Major facility closure costs   (5.4)   (5.0)
Bid response costs   (2.1)  
Operating profit from continuing operations per financial statements   78.8   58.8
         

In 2007 Bodycote has again shown strong growth with sales increasing by 14.7% to £640.5m (2006: 18.6% growth to £558.6m). Organic sales accounted for 8.8% (2006: 5.5%) of this improvement before the impact of closed sites and acquisitions for 9.6% (2006: 13.1%). The impact of the movement in exchange rates on translation of sales was adverse by 2.6% (2006: nil).

We have seen increasing demand in several key markets, most notably aerospace, power generation and oil & gas. Outsourcing (Strategic Partnerships and Long Term Agreements) provided £18m of additional sales (17% growth), resulting in a total of £123m in 2007 (2006: £105m). Some notable outsourcing agreements concluded in the year were with Sandvik, Dubai Light Railway, Rolls-Royce, General Motors, AM General, Nokia and Faurecia. Outsourcing sales continue to account for approximately 20% of Group sales and we expect further growth both in absolute terms and as a share of Group activity.

Headline operating profit increased by 14.6% to £91.3m in 2007 (2006: up 17.6% to £79.7m). The impact of exchange rates on the translation of overseas profits was adverse 2.8% (£2.2m) this year (2006: -0.1%).

Operating profit improved by £20.0m due to improved trading and as favourable changes to the rules of the UK final salary pension scheme (£4.1m) more than offset bid response costs (£2.1m) and there was no impairment of investments in associates in 2007 (2006: £8.3m).

Overall, our headline operating margin remained consistent at 14.3% in both 2007 and 2006. Whilst the Heat Treatment business saw its headline margin, as defined on page 5, increase to 14.6% (2006: 13.4%) and HIP to 35.4% (2006: 32.9%), Testing saw its margin fall to 12.0% (2006: 14.7%). This is largely attributable to increased infrastructure costs to support a larger business, greenfield start-up losses and weak performance in the food consumer products and environmental businesses within the Health Science and Environmental division of the Testing SBU in both Canada and the UK.

A charge of £1.7m (2006: £1.0m) has been accrued in head office costs for a share-based long term incentive plan (LTIP) for senior managers which is designed to incentivise growth in profit and ROCE. The LTIP was approved by shareholders at the 2006 AGM. The amount charged reflects the expected fair value, spread over the three year vesting period, adjusted for current progress towards planned targets.

As part of our plans to increase activity in Asia, we have continued to invest in equipment, real estate and in business development. We now have two heat treatment facilities in India, a further two in China and a joint Testing and Thermal Spray location in Singapore. The total operating loss associated with these developments was £1.8m (2006: £0.5m).

During the year we acquired ten new businesses and the outstanding equity, not already owned by Bodycote, in two others at a net cost of £32.7m. Only one acquisition and the purchase of the remainder of Warrington Fire Research (Aust) Pty Ltd were in Testing as we have been concentrating on the integration of the twelve businesses (38 laboratories) acquired in 2006. We expect significantly more activity in 2008 and by February 26 three businesses at a cost of £10.4m have joined the Group. Of the ten businesses acquired by the Thermal Processing SBU during the year, four are in emerging markets (China, India, Brazil and Argentina), five are focused on high added value specialist technologies in Germany and France and one gives Bodycote the market leading position in the Texas/ Oklahoma aerospace and oil & gas market.

REVIEW BY STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT (SBU)
Thermal Processing SBU

Thermal Processing reported sales of £465.2m, an increase of 12.4% on 2006. This was split 8.6% organic, 7.8% acquired and a reduction of 2.3% (£9.5m) in respect of adverse foreign exchange translation impact. ROCE improved to 12.0% (2006: 9.9%) and margins increased to 16.6% (2006: 15.2%). The ten businesses acquired represent fourteen facilities at a net cost of £30.9m. Energy cost increases have been less in 2007 than 2006. Taking the last two years together, all energy cost increases have now been recovered. As part of our continuous review of operations, we closed three heat treatment facilities: Lexington (USA), Charvonnex (France) and Koping (Sweden) with a proportion of the work and some of the equipment transferred to other locations. All of the associated cost has been charged to headline operating profit. However, the costs associated with closing five sites previously treated as exceptional have risen and the associated provision has been increased by £3.4m.

gbr graph 01

Heat Treatment Division

The division delivered 12.5% (2006: 7.4%) growth with sales of £421.7m, which accounts for 66% of the Group revenues (2006: 67%). Margins rose to 14.6% (2006: 13.4%). The UK continued to see strong demand from power generation, aerospace and oil & gas customers resulting in 7.7% organic growth with demand for thermal spray and K-Tech coatings being particularly robust.

Our Nordic group continued to perform very well and organic sales growth was an excellent 13.6% (at constant exchange rates) on the back of several additional outsourcing contracts with a variety of blue-chip engineering customers. Demand in Germany and the Netherlands was solid with good automotive growth resulting in an organic sales increase of 9.6% (at constant exchange rates). The acquisition of Nitrion GmbH immediately before the year-end significantly enhances the Group’s position in nitriding technologies. Our Eastern European facilities continue to grow strongly with organic growth of 28.8% and a further 31.8% (at constant exchange rates) from the first full year of Bodycote ISTAS in Turkey, in which the Group has a 60% interest. Margins in Eastern Europe are generally good but the results in Turkey have been marginally impacted by costs associated with bringing safety, quality and business systems up to the standard expected by the Group.

France and Belgium made further excellent progress and margins now match other parts of our European business. Organic growth was 7.1% (at constant exchange rates), with increasing demand from both aerospace and automotive customers. The business was also strengthened by the acquisition of Techmeta SAS (electron beam welding) in February and Nitruvid SAS (a nitriding specialist, which Nitrion will complement) in July. Southern Europe had a reasonable year with very strong growth in Austria and Liechtenstein partly offset by softness in Italy and Switzerland.

North America saw organic sales grow 2.0% (at constant exchange rates) in the continuing business, although overall sales dropped by £4.8m (at constant exchange rates). Margins remained consistent with last year at 10.0%. Demand continues to be strong in the aerospace, oil & gas and power generation markets but automotive and general engineering demand is subdued. We continue to review our various locations in the light of our strategy to provide value added services with growth potential. Our investment in low pressure carburizing capability (used for new generation automotive transmission gears in particular) in Silao, Mexico, will begin production in Q3 2008 to complement our Livonia, Michigan, facility which has been operating for 15 months. We are also continuing to look for ways to consolidate the industry in key regions of the USA and the acquisition in December of Metroplex Heat Treat Inc based in Arlington, Texas, secures a leading market position for the Group in Texas/ Oklahoma. 2007 was the first full year for the Group in Brazil following the acquisition of Brasimet. Market conditions were reasonable during the year and the business had a satisfactory performance. Brasimet has a long standing physical vapour deposition (PVD) capability and to enhance our offering in the market place Bodycote acquired the small PVD activities of our associate company, SSCP Coating Sarl, in both Brazil and Argentina.

Our activities in Asia made significant progress with acquisitions in both China and India adding to the start-ups in Singapore, Ranjangaon (India) and Wuxi (China) and we absorbed losses in the greenfield locations of £0.7m.

HIP Division

The division achieved an impressive 17.0% (at constant exchange rates) organic growth rate on the back of strong demand from aerospace, power generation and oil & gas customers and a widening use of the technology especially for powder based near net shapes.

Sales were £43.5m which amounted to 7% of total Group revenues (2006: 7%). Margins were 35.4% (2006: 32.9%). The strong performance balances the disappointing results experienced when end markets were at a cyclical low in 2002/2003. Aerospace and power generation led the growth in North America while power generation and oil & gas demand were the key drivers of European growth. In late December, we purchased the remaining 51% of the equity of Traitements Compression Services SAS, the only provider of HIP services in France.

Testing SBU

Testing recorded sales of £175.3m, an increase of 21.1%. This was split 9.5% organic, 14.9% acquisition and a reduction of £4.8m (3.3%) due to foreign exchange translation impact. ROCE declined to 13.1% and margins slipped to 12.0% (2006: 14.7%) due to the costs associated with the greenfield laboratory (£1.2m), start-ups (Singapore, Bahrain, Croatia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Dubai, Canada, USA and Mexico), additional infrastructure to support the growing business and difficult trading conditions in our environmental and food businesses in both Canada and the UK.

We acquired only one Testing business and the outstanding minority in Warrington Fire Research (Aust) Pty Ltd in 2007 while we concentrated on the integration of the twelve businesses with 38 laboratories that we purchased in 2006. In line with our strategy to grow Testing relative to the size of Thermal Processing, this SBU now represents 27% of the Group’s increased revenue (2006: 26%).

gbr graph 02

Materials Testing, Engineering & Technology and Measurement Technologies (MEM) Division

The division delivered 24.9% sales growth of which 13.0% was organic. Sales were £124.4m, which accounts for 19% of group sales (2006: 18%). Margins were 13.6% (2006: 14.4%). Oil & gas, aerospace and construction demand was robust across all regions, with the Middle East particularly strong. Sales in Asia Pacific were £1.9m (2006: £1.2m).

We continued to progress the expansion of the network into emerging markets, with full service laboratories opened in Croatia, Bahrain, Singapore and Brazil. Outsourcing remains a central plank of the organic growth strategy with a significant number of deals concluded, including aerospace contracts for our laboratories in Pilzen, Czech Republic and Monterrey, Mexico; automotive engine development agreements at Mississauga, Canada; civil engineering/construction contracts in Dubai and control systems contracts at Rockford, Illinois USA.

In response to a tough trading environment in the North American automotive market, a major consolidation project has been undertaken, reducing four sites to one automotive centre of excellence in Warren, Michigan, USA. Know-how continues to be transferred around the Group with a number of areas benefiting, particularly in the emerging economies, as Group expertise is established in these new operations, e.g. Bahrain, Singapore and Mexico. A technical development laboratory has been established in the UK to formalise the roll out of specialist energy/ aerospace related testing activities.

Health Sciences and Environmental (HSE) Division

The division delivered 12.9% sales growth, with sales of £50.9m, which accounts for 8% of Group revenues (2006: 8%). Margins were 8.1% (2006: 15.5%), having been impacted by a combination of pricing pressures, wage inflation and poor weather conditions in the first half in the Environmental business in western Canada and by price pressure in both the Environmental and Food business in the UK. We have been actively addressing these issues and we are continuing to increase our emphasis on added value services. For example, our UK Food & Advisory division successfully tendered for a number of contracts from major retailers which improves our order book visibility for 2008.

And to enhance our Canadian Environmental performance, we have added three further laboratories through a combination of greenfield, outsourcing and acquisition activity in Hinton and Drayton Valley, both in Alberta and Accutest Laboratories in Ontario.

Following the major acquisition activity in 2006 we have improved operational efficiencies with laboratories closed in Windsor, UK, and in Quebec and Alberta, Canada. We continue to penetrate the fledgling environmental market in the Gulf region with long-term contracts secured in Bahrain, Oman and the UAE. Significant investment is being made in our IS systems to allow clients to download results and sample data from our laboratory information management systems via a client portal over the internet.

Associated Company – SSCP Coating Sarl (SSCP)

SSCP provides high quality PVD coatings to the same market sectors as Bodycote. Trading in 2006 was disappointing and at the beginning of 2007, as part of the refinancing of SSCP, its shareholders agreed that share warrants would be attached to £10.4m of new funding. Bodycote decided that it was in the Group’s interest to maintain its shareholding in SSCP and therefore subscribed to a pro rata portion of the new funding for £3.4m. During 2007, trading performance has improved and is expected to continue to do so in 2008. The Group currently owns 24.4% of the share capital of SSCP.

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Revenue

Group revenue from continuing operations was £640.5m, an increase of £81.9m (up 14.7%) on 2006 (£558.6m). Revenue growth for Heat Treatment was £46.7m (up 12.5%), for HIP £4.6m (up 11.8%) and for Testing £30.6m (up 21.1%). Organic growth accounted for £49.4m of total sales growth before the impact of closed sites, which had annualised sales amounting to £7.1m and acquisitions for £53.9m, while foreign currency movements had an adverse impact on revenues of £14.3m mostly resulting from the weakening of the US Dollar.

gbr graph 03

Operating Profit and Margins

Demand was robust in most of our markets in 2007 with the notable exception of North America. This had a particularly significant effect on our Testing businesses. Increases in energy and commodity prices have eased and we have managed to recover these increases through price increases. Consequently, operating profit increased by 34.0% from £58.8m to £78.8m and the margin increased from 10.5% to 12.3%.

Heat Treatment benefited from strong growth in all of our European markets. Operating profit increased by 61.6% despite the adverse impact of foreign currency movements of 1.6%. Margins increased from 9.2% to 13.3%.

HIP continued to benefit from robust aerospace and power generation demand and showed an increase in operating profit of 21.9%.

As the US business forms a greater proportion of the HIP SBU, foreign currency movements have had a much greater impact on its results, decreasing operating profit by 5.7%. Despite this margins increased from 32.9% to 35.9%.

Despite difficulties in its North American markets Testing has also continued to invest in building its infrastructure to support its growth plans. Headline operating profit grew by 1.7% before the adverse impact of foreign currency movements of 3.2%, which ultimately resulted in a fall of 1.5% in headline operating profit. Further costs for amortisation/ impairment of acquired intangible assets and goodwill (£4.8m), major facility closure costs (£2.0m) less gains on changes to pension scheme rules (£1.5m) totaled £5.3m (2006: £4.6m) and this resulted in operating profit falling by 6%.

Finance Charge

The net finance charge for the Group was £10.3m compared to £9.1m in 2006, excluding the make whole for the early termination of the US Private Placement senior notes (£3.1m).

Profit before tax

Headline profit before tax was £81.0m compared to £70.0m in 2006. Profit before tax was £68.5m compared to £46.6m in 2006. Headline Profit Before tax is defined in the table below.

Headline profit before taxation is defined as follows:

  2007   2006
  £m   £m
       
Headline Operating Profit 91.3   79.7
Net Finance Charge after the deduction of the early settlement of US Private Placement (10.3)   (9.1)
Share of associates’ interest   (0.6)
Headline Profit Before Tax 81.0   70.0
Amortisation/impairment of intangible fixed assets (1.9)   (1.0)
Impairment of goodwill (7.2)   (6.0)
Impairment of investment in associate   (8.3)
Change to pension scheme rules 4.1  
Major facility closure costs (5.4)   (5.0)
Bid response costs (2.1)  
Early settlement of US Private Placement   (3.1)
Profit before tax 68.5   46.6

Taxation

Taxation was £14.7m for the year, £12m higher than the 2006 charge which had benefited from tax settlements of £11.2m. The effective tax rate for the Group was 21.5% (2006: 5.8%).

The Group’s underlying rate of tax, which represents the tax rate before impairment of goodwill and amortisation of acquired intangibles (both of which are generally not allowable for tax purposes) and before nonrecurring items, was 19.0% (2006: 7.7%). The 2006 underlying rate is stated after the impact of specific settlements with tax authorities that reduced the tax liability by £11.2m.

The effective tax rates reflect a blend of rates in the numerous worldwide locations in which Bodycote is present, and many of these have a lower tax rate than the UK standard rate of 30%. Additionally, a number of jurisdictions have reduced their tax rates or have announced tax rate reductions, which have had a favourable impact on the Group’s effective rate.

Earnings per share

Basic headline earnings per share (as defined in note 9) increased by 17.3% to 20.3p from 17.3p. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the year were 16.6p (2006: 13.4p), an increase of 23.9%.

Dividend

The Board has recommended a final dividend of 5.25p bringing the total dividend in 2007 to 8.0p (2006: 7.0p) an increase of 14.3%. The dividend is covered 2.5 times (2006: 2.5 times) by headline earnings per share (as defined in note 9) and 2.1 times (2006: 1.9 times) by basic earnings per share.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

Our balance sheet at 31 December 2007 can be summarised as set out in the table below.

Balance sheet at 31 December 2007

  Assets   Liabilities   Net assets
  £m   £m   £m
           
Property plant and equipment 508.9     508.9
Goodwill and intangible assets 227.3     227.3
Current assets and liabilities 181.3   (157.2)   24.1
Other non-current assets and liabilities 15.0   (12.0)   3.0
Post retirement obligations   (23.9)   (23.9)
Deferred tax 29.7   (74.3)   (44.6)
Total before net debt 962.2   (267.4)   694.8
Net debt 37.7   (235.9)   (198.2)
Total as at 31 December 2007 999.9   (503.3)   496.6
Total as at 31 December 2006 889.4   (435.5)   453.9

Net assets increased by 9.4% to £496.6m (2006: £453.9m) and net assets per share by 10% to £1.56 (2006: £1.41). The main increases in the assets on the balance sheet were due to an increase in property, plant and equipment of £60.5m and an increase in goodwill and intangible assets of £15.0m, which arose from the acquisitions completed during the year. The increases in assets were partially offset by an increase in net debt of £37.3m.

Net Debt

Group net debt was £198.2m (2006: £160.9m). During the year, additional loans of £36.0m were drawn down under committed facilities. The Group continues to be able to borrow at competitive rates and therefore currently deems this to be the most effective means of funding. In 2007, a three year committed loan facility of $20m was completed.

Cash Flow Cash flow from operating activities was £108.0m compared to £109.2m in 2006, a decrease of 1.1%. After allowing for net capital expenditure of £66.9m (2006: £55.4m), the Group generated operating cash flow of £41.1m compared to £53.8m in 2006. There has been continued focus on cash collection and debtor days have decreased by 2 days to 68 days. Net interest payments in the year were £9.1m (2006: £12.8m) and tax payments were £16.0m (2006: £8.4m). Acquisitions and disposals resulted in net cash outgoings of £32.9m (2006: £86.2m).

Capital Expenditure

Net capital expenditure for the year was £66.9m compared to £55.4m in 2006. The multiple of net capital expenditure to depreciation was 1.3 times as the Group expands into emerging markets and continues to take advantage of outsourcing opportunities. With buoyant demand continuing in most markets, the Group anticipates a ratio of 1.3 times again in the current year. During the year work continued on 21 greenfield investments started since 2006 such as the greenfield heat treatment plant in Mexico, various testing facilities in the Middle East, the new testing facility in Mexico and the construction of our Indian heat treatment facility. Expansion projects with expenditure in 2007 included a new heat treatment plant in Finland, the completion of a large HIP unit in the US and the commencement of work on a new large HIP unit in Sweden.

gbr graph 04

Borrowing Facilities

At 31 December 2007, Bodycote had three committed bank facilities of £225m (2006: £225m), expiring July 2010; ?125m (2006: ?125m), expiring July 2013; and $20m (2006: nil) expiring July 2010 totalling £326.9m (2006: £309.2m). At the same date, the three facilities were drawn £175.3m (2006: £140.3m), £44.1m (2006: £43.1m) and £4.6m (2006: nil) respectively, totalling £224.0m (2006: £183.4m).

Financial Risk Management

The Group’s treasury function provides a centralised service to the Group for funding, foreign exchange, interest rate management and counterparty risk. Treasury activities have the objective of minimising risk. Treasury operations are conducted within a framework of policies and guidelines authorised and reviewed by the Company’s Board of directors, most recently on 13 December 2007.

The Group uses a number of derivative instruments that are transacted, for risk management purposes only, by specialist treasury personnel. The use of financial instruments including derivatives is permitted when approved by the Board, where the effect is to minimise risk for the Group. Speculative trading of derivatives or other financial instruments is not permitted. There has been no significant change during the financial year, or since the end of the year, to the types or scope of financial risks faced by the Group or the Group’s approach to the management of those risks.

Capital Management

The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities in the Group will be able to continue as a going concerns while maximising the return to shareholders. The capital structure of the Group consists of debt, which includes borrowings (as disclosed in note 17), cash and cash equivalents and equity attributable to equity holders of the parent, comprising capital, reserves and retained earnings (as disclosed in notes 23 and 24).

The capital structure is reviewed regularly by the Company’s Board of Directors. The Group’s policy is to maintain gearing, determined as the proportion of net debt to total capital within defined parameters, allowing movement in the capital structure appropriate to the business cycle and corporate activity. The gearing ratio at 31 December 2007 was 28% (2006: 26%).

The Group’s debt funding policy is to borrow centrally, using a mixture of short-term borrowings, longer-term loans and finance leases. These borrowings, together with cash generated from operations, are lent or contributed as equity to certain subsidiaries. The aim of the Group’s funding policy is to ensure continuity of finance at reasonable cost, based on committed facilities from several sources, arranged for a spread of maturities.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Group might not be able to settle or meet its obligations on time or at a reasonable price. Liquidity risk arises as a result of mismatches between cash inflows and outflows from the business. This risk is monitored on a centralised basis through regular cash flow forecasting: A 5 year rolling Strategic Plan, an annual budget agreed by the Board each December and a quarterly re-forecast undertaken during the financial year. The resulting forecast net debt is measured against a liquidity headroom policy which, at the current net debt levels, requires committed facilities (plus term loans in excess of one year) to exceed net debt by 50%.

As at 31 December 2007, the Group had committed facilities of £326.9m (2006: £309.2m) which exceed net debt of £198.2m (2006: £160.9m) by 65% (2006: 92%). The Group also uses uncommitted short term bank facilities to manage short term liquidity but these facilities are excluded from the liquidity headroom policy. The Group manages long term liquidity through long term committed bank facilities and will, if appropriate, raise funds on capital markets. The Group’s principal committed bank facility of £225m has a maturity of 2.6 years. The ?125m committed bank facility has a maturity of 5.6 years. In addition cash management pooling, netting and concentration techniques are used to minimise borrowings.

Market Risk

Interest rate risk

Interest rate risk arises on borrowings and cash balances (and derivative liabilities and assets) being at floating interest rates. Changes in interest rates could have the effect of either increasing or decreasing the Group’s net result. Under the Group’s interest rate management policy, the interest rates on each of the Group’s major currency monetary assets and liabilities are managed to achieve the desired mix of fixed and variable rates for each major net currency exposure. These major currencies currently include the US Dollar, Euro, Sterling, Swedish Krona and Canadian Dollar. Measurement of this interest rate risk and its potential volatility to the Group’s reported financial performance is undertaken on a monthly basis.

As at 31 December 2007, 6% of net borrowings were at fixed rates for an average period of 3.0 years.

Currency risk

Bodycote has operations in 35 countries and is therefore exposed to foreign exchange translation risk when the profits and net assets of these entities are consolidated into the Group accounts. Assets are hedged, where appropriate, by matching the currency of borrowings to the net assets. The Group principally borrows in the US Dollar, Euro, Swedish Krona and Canadian Dollar, consistent with the location of the Group’s non-sterling assets. The Group also creates further currency financial liabilities and assets using cross currency swaps in order to match currency assets with currency liabilities better. The Group recognises foreign exchange movements in equity for the translation of these net investment hedging instruments and balances. As at 31 December 2007, £231.7m of gross debt and £148.8m of foreign exchange and cross currency swap liabilities were in currencies other than sterling and net cash of £33.3m and cross currency swap assets of £140.2m were in sterling.

It is Group policy not to hedge exposure for the translation of reported profits.

Transaction foreign exchange exposures arise when entities within the Group enter into contracts to pay or receive funds in a currency different from the functional currency of the entity concerned. It is Group policy to hedge exposure to cash transactions in foreign currencies when a commitment arises, usually through the use of foreign exchange forward contracts. However the nature of the business is such that cross border sales and purchases are limited and, other than currency interest, such exposures are immaterial for the Group.

Market Risk sensitivity analysis

The Group has measured the estimated charge to the income statement and equity of either an instantaneous increase or decrease of 1% (100 basis points) in market interest rates or a 10% strengthening or weakening in sterling against all other currencies from the applicable rates as at 31 December 2007, for all financial instruments with all other variables remaining constant. This analysis is for illustrative purposes only, as in practice market rates rarely change in such a manner. The sensitivity analysis excludes the impact of market risks on net post employment benefit obligations.

Interest rate sensitivity

The interest rate sensitivity analysis is based on the following assumptions:

  • changes in market interest rates affect the interest income or expense of variable interest financial instruments;
  • changes in market interest rates only affect the income statement in relation to financial instruments with fixed interest if these are recognised at their fair value; and
  • changes in market interest rates affect the fair value of derivative financial instruments designated as hedging instruments.

Under these assumptions, a one percentage point fall or rise in market interest rates for all currencies in which the Group has variable net cash (and derivative assets) or net borrowings (and derivative liabilities) at 31 December 2007 would reduce or increase profit before tax by approximately £1.9m. There is no material impact on equity.

Currency sensitivity

The currency risk sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption that changes in exchange rates affect the non-sterling financial assets and liabilities and the interest relating to those financial assets and liabilities. Under this assumption, a 10% strengthening or weakening of sterling against all exchange rates at 31 December 2007 would have reduced or increased profit before tax and equity (before tax effects) as shown in the table below:

Currency sensitivity - impact +/-

£m On equity   On profit before tax
       
CAD 2.3   0.1
Euro 17.5   0.7
SEK 3.8   0.1
USD 9.3   0.5
Other 0.8   0.1
Total 33.7   1.5

Non-sterling financial liabilities offset the exchange rate impact on non-sterling net assets.

Counterparty risk

Counterparty risk encompasses settlement risk on derivative financial instruments and money market contracts and credit risk on cash and time deposits. The Group monitors its credit exposure to its counterparties via their credit ratings (where applicable) and through its policy, thereby limiting its exposure to any one party to ensure there is no significant concentration of credit risk. Group policy is to enter into such transactions only with counterparties with a long term credit rating of A-/A3 or better. However, acquired businesses occasionally have dealings with banks with lower credit ratings. Business with such banks is moved as soon as practicable. The counterparties to the financial instruments transacted by the Group are major international financial institutions and whilst these counterparties may expose the Group to credit losses in the event of non-performance, it considers the risk of material loss, given our policy, to be acceptable. The notional amounts of financial instruments used in interest rate and foreign exchange management do not represent the credit risk arising through the use of these instruments. The immediate credit risk of these instruments is generally estimated by the fair value of contracts with a positive value. The maximum exposure to credit risk for time deposits and other financial assets is represented by their carrying amount.

Credit risk

Credit risk arises from the possibility that customers may not be able to settle their obligations as agreed. To manage this risk the Group periodically assesses the financial reliability of customers. The majority of the Group’s trade receivables are due for maturity within 60 days.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited. The Group has a diverse customer base of over 60,000 customers and is not reliant on any one business sector, end market, or client. The largest customer represents c. 3% of total Group revenue and the top ten customers account for c. 9%. Bodycote’s diverse client base provides the Group with balanced demand from a number of sectors as seen below. Management therefore believes there is no further credit risk provision required in excess of the normal provision for bad and doubtful receivables (see note 16).

Market sector analysis

gbr graph 05

DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION ARRANGEMENTS

The Group has defined benefit pension obligations in the UK, Germany, Sweden, USA and Brazil and cash lump sum obligations in France, Italy and Turkey, which are all reflected in the Group balance sheet. In the UK, the Group has a final salary scheme, which was closed to new members in April 2001, but continues to accrue benefits for the 260 current employee members. The deficit as calculated by the scheme actuary at 31 December 2007 using the principles of IAS 19 is £13.4m.

The Group’s Heat Treatment business in Germany has inherited several defined benefit arrangements. They are all unfunded and are closed to new members but existing members continue to accrue benefits. The IAS 19 liability at 31 December 2007 was £2.6m. In Sweden, the Group has two defined benefit arrangements. One is funded and one is unfunded and each is open to new employees. The IAS 19 liability at 31 December 2007 was £2.0m. The Group sponsors five defined benefit pension arrangements in the USA which were inherited with the acquisition of Lindberg and had a total IAS 19 deficit at 31 December 2007 of £0.2m. There are no further accruals on any of these plans. Brasimet operates a defined benefit plan for three senior members of staff. It is fully funded and the members continue to accrue benefits. At 31 December 2007 it had a surplus of £0.1m. In France we operate a plan which pays a cash lump sum on retirement and also for long service. The plan is open to new employees but by its nature is not mortality dependent. It is unfunded and the IAS 19 liability at 31 December 2007 was £4.9 m. Italy and Turkey also have cash lump sum obligations which are open to new members. The IAS 19 liability is £0.7m for Italy and £0.1m for Turkey.

POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS

After the year end the Group purchased Accutest Laboratories Limited, a Canadian analytical testing business, Metlab (Int.) Ltd in Eire which provides materials testing and non-destructive testing services and Thai Inductions Services Co. Limited, Thailand’s largest metallurgical services provider. The total consideration for these transactions was £10.4m.

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

During the year there were no material changes to accounting policies.

GOING CONCERN

After making enquiries, the directors have formed the opinion that at the time of approving the financial statements, there is a reasonable expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason the directors continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.

PRINCIPAL RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Markets

The key risk we face is a reduction in end market demand, but with the exception of the automotive sector in western markets, forecast demand in the near term appears robust..

Commercial relationships

The Group benefits from many long term and partnership arrangements with key customers. Damage to or loss of any of these relationships may be detrimental to Group results although we believe this is highly unlikely. Given that our top ten customers account for only c. 9% of sales, with the balance made up by many thousands of customers, we have low revenue concentration risk. The Group has no significant supplier dependency.

Competitors

With the exception of HIP, our markets are fragmented and this means that the actions of competitors are typically felt locally rather than across the Group. The small market and concentrated supply of HIP means that there is a greater risk of material impact on this division should competitors add significant capacity.

Human Resources

People are the Group’s greatest asset and also form its largest cost. We work hard at maintaining a respectful and trusting relationship with all employees. However, we are mindful that there must be strong control on these costs, which can be flexed more easily in North America, the UK and emerging economies, but much less so in Western Europe where we strive to keep about 15% of our workforce flexible against a background of more restrictive employment laws.

Safety and Health

Our work environment has numerous and varied risks which we strive to mitigate by providing systems, equipment, training and supervision. Risk is evaluated by internal and external resources so that it is continuously managed and mitigated.

Brand and Reputation

Bodycote is a valuable and well-known business to business brand. Any damage to the brand because of the breakdown of commercial relationships, non-compliance with laws and regulations, misuse of human or other resources in breach of our corporate ethos could have an adverse impact on the Group as a whole. For these reasons Bodycote has instituted an effective programme under which employees can and do use the Group’s open door policy to report legitimate concerns about business conduct to the most senior executives and non-executive directors.

Energy

.An increase in energy cost is a risk which we have been able to mitigate so far, although with some time lag, through price adjustments or surcharges and we expect to be able to continue this practice.

Operations

Our stringent quality systems, our internal and external auditing as well as our customers verification of our results, minimise the risk of releasing faulty parts or test results into use, which could arise as a result of system or human failure.

Environmental

Some of our heat treatment plants use solvents and other hazardous chemicals in small quantities. There is therefore the potential for ground contamination at our facilities. Past exposures are remediated as and when required. The likelihood of future problems is mitigated by our procedures, typically under the requirement of ISO 14001 environmental systems.

Foreign exchange

Although the Group has all but 17% of its sales generated outside the UK, the overwhelming majority of those sales are supplied locally to customers buying in the currency of our input costs. Consequently transaction risk is low. We are, however, exposed to fluctuation in exchange rates in respect of the translation of non-sterling denominated results. In common with the majority of UK listed companies we do not hedge this exposure. However, we do partially hedge our balance sheet assets and liabilities through a mixture of local currency loans and cross currency swaps.

RESOURCES

The Group has key resources which are critical to its continued success: People, Technology, Approvals and Systems.

People

The strength of our Group primarily rests in our people and one of the key challenges for management is to ensure availability of appropriately qualified people to support our continued growth. We are fortunate to have a competent and committed international team that is well respected in technical and business circles. Most of our acquisitions are based on historical relationships with Bodycote personnel which is a testament to the integrity of our people. The Board has established a remuneration policy which rewards performance while offering competitive base packages. In line with our policy of continuous improvement we have established a leadership development programme to improve the succession pipeline for our future business leadership. With the opportunity for career development we believe we can continue to sustain and grow the Group into the future.

Technology

The technology we apply in delivering our services is mostly generic. The differentiator is in our know-how in applying that technology, the quality standards we adhere to, the depth of technical knowledge we are able to deliver and the consistency of service. In those instances where we have unique technology, we have principally relied upon confidentiality with patent protection for niche areas.

Approvals

We have 56 facilities registered to Nadcap, the international aerospace quality standard. All Thermal Processing facilities are certified to at least one quality standard (e.g. ISO 9001, TS 16949, Nadcap) and by the end of the year 131 out of 194 Thermal Processing facilities were certified to ISO 14001 environmental standards. Testing has 102 of its 115 facilities accredited to the laboratory management standard ISO 17025. Our reputation for strong compliance differentiates us in the market place and assures customers of our ability to deliver consistent quality. This makes our customers’ decision to outsource critical components easier.

Systems

Information systems provide the systems that allow us to operate successfully a large distributed network. It is critical that we continue to develop our systems so we can have the most efficient information processes for ourselves, our customers and so we have the ability to identify and control costs across the whole of the Group. We use computer and internet technology to provide secure real-time job status as well as technical support to our customers.

CORPORATE ETHOS

In achieving Bodycote’s aim to be recognised globally as the leading provider of thermal processing and in testing services, the Board has over time developed several principles which will apply in its dealings with stakeholders and the wider community.

Safety, health and the environment

Bodycote has a proactive approach to safety, health and the environment and is committed to the highest practicable standards of safety and health management and to the minimisation of adverse environmental impacts.

Human Resources

Bodycote’s employment policies are non-discriminatory, complying with all current legislation to engender equal opportunity irrespective of race, gender, religion, disability, sexual orientation or nationality. Harassment is not tolerated.

Ethical Standards

All Bodycote personnel are expected to apply a high ethical standard, consistent with an international UK-listed company.

Compliance with laws

Bodycote has systems in place designed to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and conformity with all relevant codes of business practice.

Competition

Bodycote aims to win business in a differentiated high value manner: We do not employ unfair trading methods and we compete vigorously but fairly within the requirements of the applicable laws. Employees are prohibited from either giving or receiving any inducements.

Conflicts of interest

Employees are expected to ensure that their personal interests do not at any time conflict with those of Bodycote. Shareholder employees are advised of and comply with share trading codes.

Politics

Bodycote does not make political donations.

As a result of these principles, some key areas of focus have emerged, namely in respect of people, safety, health and the environment.

KEY AREAS OF FOCUS

Training and Education

The Group sponsors The Bodycote Educational Foundation, a registered charity, whose aim is to fund relevant educational and training opportunities. These aims are fulfilled by supporting short term student placements at Bodycote facilities to work on specific projects of benefit to the Group. Since 1996, the Foundation has sponsored over 265 students from 10 countries. The Foundation also supports the annual Prize Paper Competition. In its twelfth year, the competition has become one of the most highly regarded in its field. Numerous entries from universities and materials science institutes worldwide follow a rigorous selection process, with five entrants reaching the final presentation judged by management and engineering academics. Winners receive a cash prize, publication in a peer reviewed journal and potential for career development within the Group.

Safety & Health

Appropriate safety and health policies and procedures are in force in both SBUs. In 2004 the Group commenced reporting its performance internally in terms of lost time, frequency and severity of accidents in a uniform manner. As a result, each SBU is now able to benchmark its safety and health performance and formulate criteria for improvements. Bonus payments to Directors and senior executives are in part dependent on achievement of these targets.

Environment

Bodycote has for many years contributed to the reduction of the environmental impact of industry. By adopting the latest technologies as they have become available, Bodycote has provided its customers with environmentally friendly solutions to their heat treatment requirements. The replacement, where possible, of harmful materials has reduced the need for disposal of waste products. At the same time the adoption of high efficiency heating systems has reduced energy consumption and reduced emissions.

The success of Bodycote’s processes in addressing these issues is key to our environmental credentials. We do not simply aim to minimise our own energy consumption, but also to effect substantial reductions in our customers’ energy use.

Bodycote operates modern, efficient heat treatment furnaces around the clock. We aggregate demand from a wide range of customers to maximise efficiency and minimise energy costs. By replacing underutilised, in-house thermal processing operations with Bodycote’s state of the art equipment, the overall amount of energy used can be dramatically reduced.

The range of services offered across the Group is designed to enhance the suitability and operational lifetime of components and for recycling at the end of their working lives. This increase in the working life of components has a major effect on the amount of raw materials that are processed. Modern treatments also allow new technologies, such as common rail diesel systems, to be introduced within acceptable financial constraints. This, in turn, reduces the environmental impact of motor vehicles by improving fuel consumption and reducing emissions. At every stage where Bodycote is involved in the manufacturing cycle, our operations aim to lessen the overall impact on the environment.

CURRENT TRADING AND PROSPECTS

Our customers in aerospace, oil & gas, power generation and health sciences are forecasting positive growth through 2008 despite widespread predictions of economic slowdown. Many of the markets that Bodycote serves, notably aerospace, power generation and oil & gas, operate on long cycles, with significant committed order books. North American automotive (4.9% of our Group sales) is forecast to build 1% fewer cars and light trucks in 2008, compared to 2007.

Outsourcing by western manufacturers continues to grow with sales reaching £123m in 2007, an increase of 17% (2006: £105m) and this trend is set to continue. Our focus on maximising capacity utilisation will allow us to provide manufacturers with lower overall costs for their thermal processing and testing needs. The increased outsourcing growth has partially been absorbed into existing plant and equipment and in some cases additional equipment has been installed. We expect this pattern to be repeated in 2008.

Our strategy to increase our presence in developing economies, including those in Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and the Middle East, is progressing. Sales now account for 9.1% of Group sales (2006: 4.6%). The early demand for high quality subcontracting is somewhat lower than anticipated in Asia but we remain confident of the long term opportunity. In total our greenfield sites in the emerging markets recorded operating losses of £2.4m in 2007.

We enter 2008 with market conditions for heat treatment remaining favourable in all territories and market sectors with the exception of the Great Lakes area of North America, where much of the work comes from the automotive industry. Given the strength of the order books amongst our aerospace, power generation and oil & gas customer base and, given our market share gains in the automotive sector, we are confident about the Group’s prospects not withstanding the uncertainty about the level of consumer demand in 2008, particularly in North America.

HIP continues to experience increasing demand from its key aerospace, power generation and oil & gas markets. A new large HIP vessel went into production in September in the USA and is ramping up sales as forecast. We have expanded our Swedish facility to improve the efficiency of fabricating containers used in powder HIPped near net shape components and in preparation for a new large HIP vessel which will go into production in Q1 2010. The acquisition of the remaining 51% of the equity of Traitements Compression Services SAS in Magny-Cours, France gives us control over this facility enabling us to utilise this capacity in Southern Europe more effectively.

After another good performance in 2007, the MEM division of Testing is expected to continue its success in 2008. The weakness in the North American automotive market has been addressed by restructuring our laboratory facilities in Michigan. In HSE a major cost reduction exercise has been undertaken which has seen us exit several locations in Canada and management has been reorganised accordingly across the whole of North America. Similarly in the UK, a number of environmental facilities have been closed to reduce the cost base and the Food Group have increased their focus on high added value advisory services. We expect a significant improvement in the performance of the HSE division in 2008.

Since the end of 2007 we have acquired three businesses (two Testing, one Thermal Processing) for a total consideration of £10.4m. We have a strong pipeline of acquisition candidates for both Thermal Processing and Testing. On average we expect to continue investing about £60m per annum on acquisitions.

Capital expenditure for 2008 are expected to be at 1.3 times depreciation (2007: 1.3 times) reflecting the continuing investment in greenfield locations in developing economies, expanding our HIP capacity and supporting our continuing outsourcing growth. Ongoing operations require around 0.8 times depreciation to sustain their businesses.

Since the start of the current financial year, trading has been above the levels for the same period in 2007 in both SBUs and in all geographies. We enter 2008 with renewed confidence that we will deliver another successful performance. Finally, the employees and the Board of Bodycote would like to thank our outgoing Chairman, James Wallace, for his dedicated service to the company. Under James’ leadership, Bodycote has been strengthened while growing our businesses in line with our strategy. We all wish James continued success and personal happiness in the future.

john hubbard

J D Hubbard
Chief Executive
26 February 2008

david landless

D F Landless
Finance Director
26 February 2008